HP 510-p102nf

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics38.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemHP 510-p102nf  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81B4
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '22 at 08:34
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 79.6
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 128
58% 93.6 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 198
30% 220 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.1% Below average
Lighting 44.8
Reflection 58.6
Parallax 71.6
36% 58.3 fps
MRender 57.9
Gravity 52.6
Splatting 43.6
41% 51.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 960GB-$48
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS9006B5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 40 73 92 23 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 428
Write 225
Mixed 308
SusWrite 87.3
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 24.5
96% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 191
160% 231 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3000C16K4D 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 10.1
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 510-p102nf Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: HP 510-p102nf

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $148
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback