HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2166
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160718
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 10 '17 at 01:56
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 85.4
1-Core 82.9
2-Core 137
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 194
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M
HP(103C 2166) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8813
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
6.04% Terrible
Lighting 7.47
Reflection 8.08
Parallax 8.84
6% 8.13 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 7.47
Splatting 8.65
6% 7.02 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.04%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
99GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 480
Write 265
Mixed 273
75% 339 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 25.9
115% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 36.9
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 30.7
42% 72.9 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74%
Great: 114%
Toshiba Q300 Pro. 256GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYRA0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 500
Write 319
Mixed 480
96% 433 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 34.7
120% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 154
148% 233 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB BLS4G3N169ES4.16FE 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.1% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 15.7
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 4,259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback