Onlogic HX500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemOnlogic HX500  (all builds)
MotherboardOnLogic EXM501
Memory59 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '22 at 15:29
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900TE
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 213
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 624
61% 500 Pts
64-Core 848
52% 848 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1069
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.97% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 8.7
6% 8.8 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 12
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.97%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMTS952T2 256GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02J0T4GB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 119 118 119 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 496
Write 156
Mixed 202
SusWrite 119
53% 243 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 33.7
122% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 128
100% 139 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 86%
Transcend TS1TMTS952T2 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: 02J0T4GB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 432 408 438 437 435 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
105% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 436
Mixed 404
SusWrite 431
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 45.3
144% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 127
148% 256 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS4GSH64V2E 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.9% Good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 22.3
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 24.6
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HX500 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Onlogic HX500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback