Dynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-H-103

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-H-103  (all builds)
MotherboardDynabook DBIIP301
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210528
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateDec 13 '22 at 09:50
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 52.8
1-Core 81.3
2-Core 174
56% 103 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 244
30% 231 Pts
64-Core 233
14% 233 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Device(3100 0002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1960
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
5.25% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 6.4
5% 5.13 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 8.5
6% 6.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.25%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 256GB SSD 256GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.2.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 225 303 231 177 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 355
Write 355
Mixed 342
SusWrite 222
72% 319 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 13.7
50% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 228
168% 220 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 151%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.5% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 9
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9.7
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE PRO C50-H-103 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-H-103

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback