Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	19.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4440-$128 81,111 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 69.6 1-Core 84.9 2-Core 163 61% 106 Pts	4-Core 290 8-Core 312 40% 301 Pts	64-Core 308 19% 308 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Lighting 18.3 Reflection 18.5 Parallax 18.7 15% 18.5 fps	MRender 15.7 Gravity 19 Splatting 17.1 14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0601B SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 45 47 48 51 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Read 280 Write 34.3 Mixed 47.5 SusWrite 43.8 22% 101 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 0.5 21% 6.13 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-02X.A00LF 2x8GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 18 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 14.9 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	326x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	201x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	175x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	53x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	37x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	31x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $343

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16