Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190308
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 13 '22 at 05:13
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	BGD-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Memory 90.8 1-Core 124 2-Core 238 86% 151 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 436 58% 431 Pts	64-Core 432 27% 432 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 2302) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Lighting 68.2 Reflection 62.6 Parallax 90 56% 73.6 fps	MRender 65 Gravity 77.6 Splatting 46.6 50% 63.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68 92,081 User benchmarks, average bench 224% 248GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 507 537 570 660 660 662 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	153% Outstanding	Read 572 Write 547 Mixed 555 SusWrite 599 128% 568 MB/s	4K Read 44.5 4K Write 97.9 4K Mixed 59.5 196% 67.3 MB/s	DQ Read 833 DQ Write 613 DQ Mixed 750 553% 732 MB/s
Poor: 144% ↑ This bench: 153% Great: 295%
Adata SU650 240GB-$70 47,016 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 223GB free Firmware: SBFME1.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 153 154 161 157 168 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Read 325 Write 289 Mixed 217 SusWrite 180 57% 253 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 51.4 4K Mixed 29.7 104% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 295 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 200 178% 267 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-2400C17-8GNT 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.1% Very good	MC Read 26.4 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 22.1 74% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 29.7 SC Mixed 22.5 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 66.1 60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M S2H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,199x
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	694x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	215x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	310x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	210x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	208x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	253x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	153x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $56Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	91x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	118x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	56x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $343

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16