Lenovo 20ASS0UH04

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20ASS0UH04  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20ASS0UH04
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140529
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateDec 13 '22 at 05:08
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 44.2
2-Core 86
44% 67.9 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 181
18% 146 Pts
64-Core 64.2
4% 64.2 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 501E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.92% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.2
3% 1.47 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 5
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.92%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD220 240GB-$33
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0510A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 84 6.2 78 87 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 440
Write 370
Mixed 378
SusWrite 106
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 17.3
75% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 36.8
88% 181 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 Kingston ACR16D3LS1KBGR/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
46.3% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 15.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20ASS0UH04 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20ASS0UH04

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback