Asus ROG MAXIMUS X APEX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive279% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X APEX  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '22 at 04:42
Run Duration336 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 98.5
1-Core 160
2-Core 321
105% 193 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 926
91% 745 Pts
64-Core 1,177
73% 1,177 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 102%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6796) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 527.56
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 322
Reflection 184
Parallax 186
262% 230 fps
Gravity 156
Splatting 122
121% 139 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140
878GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT303.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1928 1032 1063 1036 1064 1062 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 1,542
Write 2367
Mixed 1,667
SusWrite 1,197
383% 1,693 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 74.1
265% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,552
DQ Write 1253
DQ Mixed 1,411
1,054% 1,405 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 279%
Great: 303%
ST10000NM005G-2MU133 10TB
774GB free
Firmware: EAK1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 203 194 203 214 203 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 109
Write 111
Mixed 89.9
SusWrite 204
29% 128 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 1.2
28% 8.33 MB/s
DQ Read 2.9
DQ Write 12.7
DQ Mixed 2.5
4% 6.03 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 35%
ST10000NM005G-2MU133 10TB
400GB free
Firmware: EAK1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 120 118 106 119 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 125
Write 121
Mixed 100
SusWrite 114
26% 115 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 1
34% 10.5 MB/s
DQ Read 3.4
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 3.4
4% 7.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 35%
ST14000NM001G-2KJ103 14TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 156 162 164 161 158 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.9% Below average
Read 191
Write 197
Mixed 104
SusWrite 160
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 14.5
DQ Mixed 1.7
3% 5.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 90%
WDS100T3XHC-00SJG0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1931 1515 1509 1513 1516 1511 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 1,822
Write 2,218
Mixed 1,774
SusWrite 1,582
418% 1,849 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 73.1
276% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1582
DQ Write 1,361
DQ Mixed 1,093
922% 1,345 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 319%
Great: 334%
Seagate ST14000DM001-2JC101 14TB
2TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 125 123 125 125 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 105%
Gb0750c4 414 750GB
4GB free
Firmware: 7101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 59 57 57 53 46 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 53.1
Write 55.2
Mixed 37
SusWrite 52.6
36% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C18 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 46.8
MC Mixed 29.9
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 50.6
SC Mixed 35.5
105% 36.8 GB/s
Latency 43.8
91% 43.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X APEX Builds (Compare 302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X APEX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $885
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback