Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '22 at 19:12
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 122
2-Core 248
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 470
59% 450 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Gigabyte(1458 2302) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Lighting 69.1
Reflection 62.4
Parallax 91.2
56% 74.2 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 73.6
Splatting 46.2
49% 61.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
354GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 603 585 503 293 321 315 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 623
Write 613
Mixed 596
SusWrite 436
128% 567 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 75.3
248% 85.6 MB/s
DQ Read 822
DQ Write 647
DQ Mixed 914
635% 794 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 162%
Great: 295%
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
201GB free
Firmware: SBFME1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 68 110 48 92 96 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.3% Below average
Read 219
Write 100
Mixed 89.8
SusWrite 94.2
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 7.7
54% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 23.8
DQ Mixed 105
56% 51 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 99%
JetFlash Transcend 64GB
39GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 63.2
Write 23.2
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 15.9
34% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
29% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C17-8GNT 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
75.5% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 21.9
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 22.2
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M S2H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback