HP Laptop 14-bs0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 14-bs0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 831C
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '22 at 14:20
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6006U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
42% Average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 36.3
2-Core 86.1
39% 62.1 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 128
16% 123 Pts
64-Core 125
8% 125 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 831C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 4.1
3% 3.97 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 6.2
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Midasforce 1TB 1TB
791GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0609B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 266 298 298 334 336 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 434
Write 356
Mixed 366
SusWrite 299
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 18.5
84% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 47.3
76% 145 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4H16GS24A8 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 22.2
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 14.5
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 14-bs0xx Builds (Compare 559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-bs0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback