ELSA EA H510M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemELSA EA H510M-E  (all builds)
MotherboardELSA EA H510M-E
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220518
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 10 '22 at 20:35
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 55.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 245
74% 142 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 790
77% 632 Pts
64-Core 939
58% 939 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 72%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
4.66% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 6.8
5% 7 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 0.2
4% 6.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.66%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta S800 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RY29V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 352 356 343 347 347 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 435
Write 334
Mixed 328
SusWrite 347
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 11.7
99% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 20.4
61% 127 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX426C16FB2/8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 13.5
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 8.5
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EA H510M-E Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: ELSA EA H510M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback