Asrock Z590 Phantom Gaming-ITX/TB4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 215%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 216%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics199% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive380% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z590 Phantom Gaming-ITX/TB4  (all builds)
Memory59.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '22 at 19:20
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$254
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 178
2-Core 356
112% 209 Pts
4-Core 686
8-Core 1,218
115% 952 Pts
64-Core 1,644
102% 1,644 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
EVGA(3842 3975) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
199% Outstanding
Lighting 287
Reflection 279
Parallax 313
234% 293 fps
MRender 338
Gravity 247
Splatting 183
201% 256 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 199%
Great: 230%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDVT2TB-D8 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.H.F.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2422 2507 2556 2667 2680 2663 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
380% Outstanding
Read 1,955
Write 2,694
Mixed 1,736
SusWrite 2,582
508% 2,242 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 53.2
268% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,700
DQ Write 1257
DQ Mixed 1,400
1,068% 1,452 MB/s
Poor: 212%
This bench: 380%
Great: 583%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Mushkin MLX4C360GKKP32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2600 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 47.2
MC Write 46.5
MC Mixed 43.2
130% 45.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 50
SC Mixed 36.2
108% 38 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 126%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z590 Phantom Gaming-ITX/TB4 Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z590 Phantom Gaming-ITX/TB4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $656
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback