Asrock Z68 Professional Gen3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics76.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z68 Professional Gen3  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '22 at 13:59
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 155
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 400
42% 339 Pts
64-Core 411
26% 411 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.9% Very good
Lighting 93.4
Reflection 108
Parallax 96.5
76% 99.2 fps
MRender 92.7
Gravity 96.1
Splatting 97.8
78% 95.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 356 311 303 298 249 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 302
Write 381
Mixed 260
SusWrite 311
71% 314 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 29.3
99% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 31.2
DQ Write 98.8
DQ Mixed 44.2
40% 58.1 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 113%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
70GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 184 182 190 190 190 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 349
Write 337
Mixed 318
SusWrite 186
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 33
106% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 224
168% 225 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 129%
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
346GB free
Firmware: H220115
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 183 180 185 186 186 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
64% Good
Read 344
Write 330
Mixed 322
SusWrite 183
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 28.4
98% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 199
147% 195 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 64%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
36GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 63 63 62 64 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 56
Write 63.6
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 63.8
43% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.9% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68 Professional Gen3 Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Professional Gen3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $615
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback