Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	ECT FB 23186 One Computer Core i5-45 (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte B250M-D2V-CF
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '22 at 09:13
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 80.3 1-Core 125 2-Core 244 83% 150 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 386 53% 391 Pts	64-Core 393 24% 393 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gainward(10B0 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.7% Poor	Lighting 34.8 Reflection 38.6 Parallax 37.5 28% 37 fps	MRender 36.9 Gravity 37.2 Splatting 26 27% 33.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z33130RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 29 19 19 32 13 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.5% Average	Read 273 Write 211 Mixed 202 SusWrite 27.3 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 64.5 4K Mixed 15.9 81% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 6.9 DQ Mixed 33.4 38% 70.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 86%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 172GB free Firmware: S3E00100 SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 373 378 390 408 417 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Read 434 Write 367 Mixed 384 SusWrite 391 89% 394 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 64 4K Mixed 17.9 97% 36.1 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 58 104% 199 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 293GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 133 128 127 132 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Read 144 Write 126 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 131 79% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-012.A00G 2x8GB 1,882 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	MC Read 27.5 MC Write 30.2 MC Mixed 22.4 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 26.5 SC Mixed 21.9 62% 21.8 GB/s	Latency 80 50% 80 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x

SSD
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	1x
Blue 500GBWD $93Bench 86%, 19,345 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBCorsair $25Bench 42%, 47,473 samples	1x
9905678-012.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 73%, 1,882 samples	1x
9905678-105.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 73%, 517 samples	1x

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $215

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16