Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200729
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateDec 10 '22 at 03:41
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 69.7
1-Core 145
2-Core 286
88% 167 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 1030
93% 785 Pts
64-Core 2177
135% 2177 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 175
Parallax 182
152% 181 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 139
Splatting 119
118% 148 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 500
Write 290
Mixed 300
80% 363 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 40.4
152% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 232
183% 254 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE640 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJAONS04
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 126
Write 130
Mixed 66.7
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 91%
Generic MassStorageClass 8GB
3GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 21.9
Write 5.2
Mixed 7
11% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 2
117% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 22%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
6TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 51.3
Write 34.2
Mixed 31.2
46% 38.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
161% 3 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.3% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 24.3
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 25.3
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,660 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $661
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback