OEM G41 775 ICH7 8712

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardOEM G41 775 ICH7 8712  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '22 at 13:47
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5430
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 79
1-Core 42.3
2-Core 84.4
46% 68.6 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 137
19% 138 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.3% Above average
Lighting 65.6
Reflection 64.6
Parallax 89.2
54% 73.1 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 75.1
Splatting 47.2
50% 63.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3H01103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 189 191 223 228 222 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.4% Average
Read 224
Write 188
Mixed 181
SusWrite 201
45% 198 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 12.4
74% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 28.9
DQ Write 83.6
DQ Mixed 20.3
26% 44.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
23.7% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.9
21% 7.43 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G41 775 ICH7 8712 Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: OEM G41 775 ICH7 8712

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $137
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback