Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics82.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory51.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170609
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 09 '22 at 13:08
Run Duration352 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 189
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 563
55% 451 Pts
64-Core 743
46% 743 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.7% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 107
Parallax 99
84% 103 fps
MRender 96.8
Gravity 99.3
Splatting 96.3
80% 97.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M8Pe NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$200
228GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,184
Write 972
Mixed 665
208% 940 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 40.2
136% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 661
DQ Write 434
DQ Mixed 532
401% 543 MB/s
Poor: 128% Great: 237%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$75
103GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 456
Write 413
Mixed 372
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 40.3
130% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 305
243% 341 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$75
693GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 377
Write 424
Mixed 337
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 29
102% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 341
254% 336 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 104%
Toshiba MG06ACA10TE 10TB
63GB free
Firmware: 0104
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 174
Write 159
Mixed 93.5
105% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 137%
Hitachi HUS724040ALA640 4TB
26GB free
Firmware: MFAOAA70
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 110
Write 107
Mixed 73.3
72% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 97%
Imation 16GB
7GB free, PID 0165
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 24.1
Write 11.2
Mixed 7.7
15% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
39% 3.2 MB/s
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
5GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 138
Write 129
Mixed 19.2
110% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
34% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 53%
QNAP TR-004 DISK01 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0013
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 104 108 107 109 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 155
Write 146
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 107
162% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
150% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 59%
QNAP TR-004 DISK02 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0013
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 103 108 106 109 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
44% Average
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 66
SusWrite 107
128% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 44%
Great: 76%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB
58GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 187 188 189 183 184 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 145
Write 120
Mixed 104
SusWrite 185
189% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.3
217% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 95%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB
30GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 124
Write 101
Mixed 99.8
135% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.2
211% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 95%
QNAP TR-004 DISK00 8TB
9GB free, PID 0013
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 155
Write 177
Mixed 88.7
177% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.7
199% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSC.16FB 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
106% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 41.4
118% 41.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 21.1
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 106%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 122% - Outstanding Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback