HP 500-536d

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-536d  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B2C
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '22 at 10:00
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 71.3
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 154
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 255
33% 251 Pts
64-Core 252
16% 252 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 2B2C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
2.79% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 4.2
2% 3.13 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.7
3% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.79%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 512GB
451GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11573
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 371 380 365 397 399 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 414
Write 384
Mixed 378
SusWrite 384
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 33.3
126% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 231
176% 233 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HKED3041AAB3H3HA1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 15.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 98.4
41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-536d Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-536d

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback