Asrock FM2A85X Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A85X Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '22 at 02:23
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 51.1
2-Core 113
50% 80.1 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 208
26% 201 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1505 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.1% Poor
Lighting 33.1
Reflection 36.6
Parallax 44.8
27% 38.2 fps
MRender 30.8
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 26.4
24% 30.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hyperx Fury 3D 240GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 141 74 62 72 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 321
Write 268
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 88.3
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 12.5
50% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 29.4
DQ Write 87.5
DQ Mixed 23.5
28% 46.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 98%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
533GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 147 74 63 72 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 153
Write 149
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 91
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Xtreem-LV-2666 Xtreem-LV-2666 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
37.3% Below average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 13.6
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 10.5
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A85X Extreme4 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A85X Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $462
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback