Lenovo 90L10096AU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 90L10096AU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36EB
Memory20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '22 at 00:37
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 85.8
1-Core 133
2-Core 251
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 757
76% 617 Pts
64-Core 686
42% 686 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Zotac(19DA C548) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.52
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.3% Average
Lighting 55.1
Reflection 73.3
Parallax 48.4
45% 58.9 fps
MRender 41.8
Gravity 49.5
Splatting 45.3
37% 45.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TB
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 820 779 767 739 754 751 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,696
Write 1,490
Mixed 1163
SusWrite 768
286% 1,279 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 44.3
162% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 698
DQ Write 510
DQ Mixed 611
455% 606 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 191%
Great: 380%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FP 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 27.9
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 23.9
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90L10096AU Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: Lenovo 90L10096AU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $398
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback