Medion MD35317

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion MD35317  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B660H7-M20
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220610
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 08 '22 at 22:24
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$146
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 83.8
1-Core 174
2-Core 332
105% 197 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 1,000
95% 786 Pts
64-Core 1,154
71% 1,154 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 87C8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 181
Parallax 186
153% 185 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 140
Splatting 121
120% 151 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 133%
Great: 136%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme E15-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R 1TB
751GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EHFM31.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1946 2219 2371 210 168 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 1,513
Write 2,266
Mixed 1,266
SusWrite 1,181
352% 1,557 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 47.1
210% 81.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,392
DQ Write 1099
DQ Mixed 1,213
916% 1,235 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 251%
Great: 284%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 36.2
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 42.3
SC Mixed 29
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD35317 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

System: Medion MD35317

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $146
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback