TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell PowerEdge T410

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics75.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell PowerEdge T410
MotherboardDell PowerEdge T410  (all builds)
Memory55.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180530
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '22 at 20:50
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
49% Average
Memory 55.1
1-Core 58.6
2-Core 108
44% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 372
37% 302 Pts
64-Core 543
34% 543 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 49%
 Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$250
MSI(1462 C978)
CLim: 2167 MHz, MLim: 3592 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.9% Very good
Lighting 104
Reflection 85
Parallax 87.6
84% 92 fps
MRender 80.6
Gravity 73.7
Splatting 66.9
60% 73.7 fps
Poor: 69% ↑
This bench: 75.9%
 Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell PERC 6/i Adapter 3TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 111 62 121 116 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 550
Write 232
Mixed 460
SusWrite 109
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 24.7
4K Mixed 23.3
86% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 117
93% 128 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 60.9%
 Great: 113%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$371
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 211 203 195 204 213 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.4% Above average
Read 221
Write 211
Mixed 202
SusWrite 205
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 27.5
88% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 39.1
DQ Write 69.9
DQ Mixed 49.3
39% 52.8 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑
This bench: 51.4%
 Great: 137%
EMC LIFELINE-DISK 4.5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 31 30 31 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.9% Below average
Read 79.7
Write 31.7
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 30.9
36% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 7.4
1,204% 7 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑
This bench: 32.9%
 Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46.9% Average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 21
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 46.9%
 Great: 104%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical PowerEdge T410 Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge T410

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples9x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56601stBench 66%, 2,343 samples6x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples5x
GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples5x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples3x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples2x
SSD
PERC 6/i Adapter 898GBDellBench 94%, 4 samples3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples2x
PERC 6/i Adapter 3TBDellBench 75%, 6 samples2x
RAM
HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 4x8GBHynixBench 61%, 135 samples3x
36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 8x4GBUnknownBench 37%, 22 samples3x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 8x8GBHynixBench 86%, 188 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback