Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics98.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte G1.Sniper B5
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150813
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 08 '22 at 08:00
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 87
2-Core 170
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 283
36% 273 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Nvidia(10DE 13A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.3% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 107
Parallax 134
96% 120 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 110
Splatting 101
103% 130 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 427
Write 391
Mixed 320
84% 380 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 30.5
104% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 142
133% 208 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
515GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 139 138 139 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 129
Write 95.1
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 138
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3-1600 CL11 4GB Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 0622 DDR3-1600 CL11 4GB Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 17.9
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 19.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF Builds (Compare 763 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback