Geekom MiniAir 11

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGeekom MiniAir 11  (all builds)
MotherboardGEEKOM MiniAir 11
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '22 at 06:09
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 45.4
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 131
46% 82 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 168
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.25% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 2.7
2% 2.77 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 3.8
3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.25%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nf830 256GB 256GB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1029A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 287 265 289 239 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 302
Write 244
Mixed 295
SusWrite 244
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 10.2
62% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 0.6
46% 111 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 67%
Seagate One Touch HDD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1707
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 96.1
Write 109
Mixed 71.6
69% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
107% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WPBS26D408SWE-8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
27.7% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 10.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8.2
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MiniAir 11 Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Geekom MiniAir 11

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback