Asrock X570M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics39.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive332% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory41.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '22 at 00:06
Run Duration289 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 184
2-Core 356
113% 211 Pts
4-Core 688
8-Core 1,212
115% 950 Pts
64-Core 2,432
150% 2,432 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc A380
ASRock(1849 6004) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3802
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.3% Below average
Lighting 43.3
Reflection 51.6
Parallax 78.3
35% 57.7 fps
MRender 44.5
Gravity 71.7
Splatting 55.8
47% 57.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 1TB
815GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EHFM32.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2102 2210 2470 2388 2041 2628 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
332% Outstanding
Read 1,553
Write 2,696
Mixed 1,497
SusWrite 2,306
457% 2,013 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 70.3
267% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1231
DQ Write 905
DQ Mixed 1,133
829% 1,090 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 332%
Great: 438%
Gigabyte 20SD7-0012TB-50R 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: ECFM13.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2530 2571 1962 1099 1100 1098 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
311% Outstanding
Read 1520
Write 2168
Mixed 1,726
SusWrite 1,727
405% 1,785 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 72.6
259% 98.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,653
DQ Write 1,286
DQ Mixed 1,506
1,117% 1,482 MB/s
Poor: 265%
This bench: 311%
Great: 345%
WD WD80EDAZ-11TA3A0 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 43 43 45 45 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
74% Very good
Read 214
Write 45.7
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 44.8
68% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74%
Great: 112%
WD WD120EDBZ-11B1HA0 12TB
11TB free
Firmware: 85.00A85
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 197 199 195 196 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 198
Mixed 111
SusWrite 198
129% 176 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 1.4
412% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 114%
Great: 115%
WD WD120EDBZ-11B1HA0 12TB
11TB free
Firmware: 85.00A85
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 184 190 181 186 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 196
Mixed 116
SusWrite 184
125% 171 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 1.3
384% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 106%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 58.5
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 37.2
129% 45.1 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 37
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 120%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570M Pro4 Builds (Compare 908 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $572
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback