Dell G15 5511

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemDell G15 5511  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0FHYK3
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '22 at 22:36
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 54.7
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 183
62% 112 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 513
50% 412 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pm991a NVMe Samsung 256GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 26304039 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 965 1122 186 128 134 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,144
Write 1,063
Mixed 1,009
SusWrite 445
205% 915 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 45.1
142% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 875
DQ Write 575
DQ Mixed 705
531% 718 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 150%
Great: 199%
Cl4-3d512-q11 NVMe SSSTC 512GB
465GB free
Firmware: 25301111 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1169 1631 1838 1861 1643 1819 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 1,740
Write 1,190
Mixed 1,138
SusWrite 1,660
321% 1,432 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 30.4
167% 72 MB/s
DQ Read 919
DQ Write 563
DQ Mixed 736
550% 739 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 253%
Great: 309%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
57.5% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 18.2
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 10.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G15 5511 Builds (Compare 2,815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Dell G15 5511

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback