Lenovo 20ER002KUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive95.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20ER002KUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20ER002KUS
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '22 at 18:58
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 72
2-Core 143
56% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 373
33% 279 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M600M
Legend(17AA 222D) 2GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 513.29
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
9.2% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 10.9
9% 11.3 fps
MRender 17
Gravity 10.7
Splatting 11.4
10% 13 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.2%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
700GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 384 352 376 424 430 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 406
Mixed 366
SusWrite 388
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 37.9
124% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 350
261% 347 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905663-031.A00G Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.1% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 22.7
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20ER002KUS Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20ER002KUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback