Asus H81M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-E  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141121
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateDec 07 '22 at 18:21
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3260
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
48% Average
Memory 79.6
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 95.9
53% 81.3 Pts
4-Core 99.8
8-Core 95.8
13% 97.8 Pts
64-Core 98.1
6% 98.1 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Gigabyte(1458 34FE) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.66% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 1.9
7% 7.7 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 10
Splatting 9
8% 10.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.66%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$68
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 121 115 130 140 139 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.2% Below average
Read 207
Write 181
Mixed 167
SusWrite 127
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 13.3
4K Mixed 5
36% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 107
94% 140 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 118%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47
48GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 41 41 42 43 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 72
Write 27.1
Mixed 39.6
SusWrite 41.9
33% 45.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1600KLN-4G JM1333KLN-4G 8GB
1600, 1200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
39.2% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 13.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11.9
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-E Builds (Compare 1,822 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-E - $311

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $548
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback