Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 3955U 816 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Memory 48.9 1-Core 36.4 2-Core 51.4 30% 45.6 Pts	4-Core 56.9 8-Core 72.3 8% 64.6 Pts	64-Core 80.7 5% 80.7 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 510 6,504 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 505F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6170 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	1.99% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 2.4 2% 2 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 3.6 2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.99% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HAHQ-000L1 128GB 522 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT04L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 154 152 158 157 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Read 375 Write 356 Mixed 302 SusWrite 154 66% 297 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 29.7 4K Mixed 26.1 77% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 149 111% 148 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 1x4GB 4,120 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	25.6% Poor	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 8.2 27% 9.43 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 5.6 15% 5.3 GB/s	Latency 165 24% 165 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron 3955UIntelBench 44%, 816 samples	7x

GPU
HD Graphics 510IntelBench 2%, 6,504 samples	7x

SSD
MZ7LN128HAHQ-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 85%, 522 samples	5x
SD8SB8U128G1001 128GBSandiskBench 72%, 1,067 samples	2x

RAM
CT8G4SFS824A.C8FP Samsung M471A5143SB1-CRC 12GBUnknownBench 60%, 3 samples	2x
RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 1x4GBRamaxelBench 26%, 4,120 samples	2x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GBHynixBench 57%, 26,973 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16