Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '22 at 17:33
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 69.7
2-Core 133
60% 96.4 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 428
42% 342 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
MSI(1462 5027) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 140
Parallax 238
97% 166 fps
MRender 226
Gravity 129
Splatting 154
136% 170 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 109%
Great: 116%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 365 356 403 386 372 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 430
Write 334
Mixed 390
SusWrite 362
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 38.6
122% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 230
176% 239 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 17.9
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 14.1
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,067 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $606
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback