Lenovo 80XH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemLenovo 80XH  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171204
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateDec 07 '22 at 11:41
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User KGZ-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6006U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Memory 58.9
1-Core 53.5
2-Core 96.6
43% 69.7 Pts
4-Core 92
8-Core 122
14% 107 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 920MX
Legend(17AA 39C7) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2698
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.84% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 7.1
5% 8.13 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 7.6
7% 8.8 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.84%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 130 17 47 42 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 361
Write 213
Mixed 294
SusWrite 82.4
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 20.2
79% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 157
135% 197 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 100%
Jmicron Generic 500GB
55GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 103 101 104 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 96.6
Write 103
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 102
65% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 57%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8054 7EH95AA#ABB 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 12.9
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80XH Builds (Compare 946 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80XH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback