Asus X550JX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemAsus X550JX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550JX
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '22 at 01:31
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 156
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 408
44% 349 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Asus(1043 178D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7212
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 17.3
17% 20.6 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 15.2
13% 15.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Afox SD250-240GN 240GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2111A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 385
Write 412
Mixed 311
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 10.1
84% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 13.5
70% 156 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 91%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
0GB free, PID 0727
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 16.4
Write 3.7
Mixed 5.7
9% 8.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 Kingston 99U5469-051.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.9% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 13.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550JX Builds (Compare 1,136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550JX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback