Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 89.6 1-Core 113 2-Core 211 79% 138 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 520 57% 449 Pts	64-Core 609 38% 609 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286 8,692 User benchmarks, average bench 121% Nvidia(10DE 119A) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 527.37 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	113% Outstanding	Lighting 153 Reflection 169 Parallax 160 125% 161 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 142 Splatting 113 101% 125 fps
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 132%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HWE36P43064M001N 6.5TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 5.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.10 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 952 Write 959 Mixed 964 214% 958 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 95.7 4K Mixed 36.3 131% 51.4 MB/s	DQ Read 872 DQ Write 255 DQ Mixed 487 379% 538 MB/s
Poor: 136% Great: 176%
Hitachi HUS724040ALA640 4TB 1,620 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 348GB free Firmware: MFAOAA70 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 87.3 Write 91.3 Mixed 54.9 58% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 9ASF1G72AZ-2G3A1 2x8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.4% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 21.9 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 23.9 SC Mixed 20.1 57% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 79%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	19x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	11x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	8x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $283

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16