Lenovo 20N2S3DN00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20N2S3DN00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20N2S3DN00
Memory13.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 06 '22 at 20:55
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8365U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 71.9
1-Core 79.2
2-Core 125
56% 92.1 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 286
30% 240 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Legend(17AA 2279) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
3.75% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4
Parallax 4.1
4% 4.13 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 6.1
4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.75%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis LENSE40256GMSP34MESTB3A 256GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.3.7182
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 281 283 282 256 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 943
Write 917
Mixed 644
SusWrite 254
154% 690 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 35.4
124% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 313
238% 322 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 106%
Great: 185%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.8% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 14.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.6
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20N2S3DN00 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20N2S3DN00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback