Asus P8H67-M LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 16 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M LX  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110331
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 06 '22 at 20:52
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 54.9
2-Core 101
49% 76.7 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 166
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Zotac(19DA 5194) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
8.65% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 14.6
Parallax 10.7
8% 11.7 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 10.5
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.65%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0B-00EPW0 480GB
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UK220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 182 178 170 161 209 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 382
Write 331
Mixed 204
SusWrite 183
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 10
53% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 93.2
DQ Mixed 31.4
43% 80 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 59%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$65
523GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 122 123 125 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 105
Write 116
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 122
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-043.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 14.2
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 13.1
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M LX Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback