Asus ProArt StudioBook H5600QM_H5600QM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics91.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive278% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemAsus ProArt StudioBook H5600QM_H5600QM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H5600QM
Memory51.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220118
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateDec 06 '22 at 20:35
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 74.9
1-Core 157
2-Core 308
95% 180 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 994
94% 780 Pts
64-Core 1,283
79% 1,283 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 18F2) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.44.03
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Lighting 23.8
Reflection 114
Parallax 33.4
19% 57.1 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 26.4
Splatting 22.1
18% 21.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 21%
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 18F2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.9% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 121
Parallax 114
97% 118 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 93.3
Splatting 82.9
82% 103 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
737GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1960 2170 2098 1778 2034 1801 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 1,046
Write 2130
Mixed 1,951
SusWrite 1,974
405% 1775 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 74.4
238% 81.3 MB/s
DQ Read 953
DQ Write 888
DQ Mixed 919
690% 920 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 278%
Great: 444%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.C16FF 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 32.8
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 28.3
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProArt StudioBook H5600QM_H5600QM Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Asus ProArt StudioBook H5600QM_H5600QM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback