Asus X555LF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X555LF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555LF
Memory1.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150709
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateDec 06 '22 at 20:16
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 72.6
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 122
55% 89.8 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 188
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Asus(1043 1A6D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5107
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.08% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 6.5
4% 6 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 6.6
5% 5.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.08%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
229GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 329 372 342 401 374 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 414
Write 368
Mixed 344
SusWrite 357
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 31.5
104% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 178
134% 182 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564568FJ8NZRNSDR 0114 SH564128FJ8NWRNSQR 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.8% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11.2
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X555LF Builds (Compare 293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X555LF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback