PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Oegstone MS-7788 (all builds) |
Motherboard | MSI H61M-P31/W8 (MS-7788) |
Memory | 4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121004 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 06 '22 at 16:27 |
Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 51% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-3240
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
37.1%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
894GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 63 59 48 115 93 MB/s
|
54.6%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
40.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 41x |
Core i7-2600Intel $184Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 33x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 30x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 25x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 24x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 21x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $242 |