HP HPE-410fr

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP HPE-410fr  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100712
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateNov 08 '17 at 17:34
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 82.9
2-Core 143
58% 98.7 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 210
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.6% Below average
Lighting 39.9
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 37.3
32% 36 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 36.9
Splatting 35.7
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.4% Below average
Read 253
Write 139
Mixed 82.2
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 7.87
42% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 70.5
DQ Mixed 21.2
43% 89.2 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
156GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 114
Write 106
Mixed 99.8
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.53
117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CE80CE80 M378B5673FH0-CH9 AD80AD80 HMT351U6CFR8C-PB M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 8.4
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HPE-410fr Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP HPE-410fr

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback