PC Ebuyer Amd Am4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemPC Ebuyer Amd Am4  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF GAMING X570-PLUS
Memory58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '22 at 06:23
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Memory 88.2
1-Core 147
2-Core 293
96% 176 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 1,024
96% 797 Pts
64-Core 2,138
132% 2,138 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.4% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 142
Parallax 184
100% 150 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 141
Splatting 94.9
95% 118 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Viper M.2 VPN100 1TB
717GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1753 958 855 787 1004 1000 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,489
Write 2,569
Mixed 1,620
SusWrite 1,060
382% 1,684 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 48.5
219% 86.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,049
DQ Write 1,038
DQ Mixed 1,215
866% 1,100 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 236%
Great: 287%
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33
31GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,619
Write 1,016
Mixed 427
223% 1,021 MB/s
4K Read 63
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 53.9
186% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 816
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 235
260% 453 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 244%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
151GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 149
Write 104
Mixed 79.5
24% 111 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 8.6
44% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 16.2
DQ Write 17.5
DQ Mixed 16
12% 16.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$40
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 145
Write 154
Mixed 75.5
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
122% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
786GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 109
Write 102
Mixed 57.2
109% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.3
152% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 64%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 64GB
2GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 34.4
Write 15.2
Mixed 24.2
29% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 2.9
216% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C18D4/16GX 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 49.6
MC Write 44.1
MC Mixed 44.2
131% 46 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 40.1
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 123%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Ebuyer Amd Am4 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: PC Ebuyer Amd Am4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $299
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback