Lenovo 11T3005MGE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemLenovo 11T3005MGE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 330B
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '22 at 22:11
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G7400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 120
2-Core 215
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 274
36% 268 Pts
64-Core 273
17% 273 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 710
Legend(17AA 330B) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1273
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
4.19% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 5
4% 5.5 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 6
Splatting 6.3
5% 6.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.19%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 624 497 402 291 262 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 2,040
Write 1,479
Mixed 1,409
SusWrite 426
298% 1,339 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 59.9
193% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 58.2
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 73.3
59% 81.6 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 172%
Great: 296%
Seagate Expansion 500GB
234GB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 35 34 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 51.6
Write 32.5
Mixed 27
SusWrite 36.1
27% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 15.4
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 11T3005MGE Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 11T3005MGE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback