Asus K53U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 6%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus K53U  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K53U
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '22 at 19:09
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.45% Terrible
Memory 16
1-Core 6.4
2-Core 14.3
8% 12.2 Pts
4-Core 17.9
8-Core 16.3
2% 17.1 Pts
64-Core 15
1% 15 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.45%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
Asus(1043 104C) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.89% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.37 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.89%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 198 142 53 66 162 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.4% Poor
Read 161
Write 77.4
Mixed 212
SusWrite 116
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 8
30% 9.17 MB/s
DQ Read 40.4
DQ Write 36.2
DQ Mixed 34.9
27% 37.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 94%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$71
298GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 58 58 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 64.2
Write 60.5
Mixed 42
SusWrite 56.4
41% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Asint SSZ302G08-GDJEC 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.38% Terrible
MC Read 1.3
MC Write 1.7
MC Mixed 2.7
5% 1.9 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 1.1
SC Mixed 0.3
2% 0.53 GB/s
Latency 352
11% 352 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 5.38%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K53U Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K53U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback