Asus K55N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus K55N  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K55N
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '22 at 02:16
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4500M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Memory 47
1-Core 27.5
2-Core 44.6
27% 39.7 Pts
4-Core 63
8-Core 67.4
9% 65.2 Pts
64-Core 88.9
6% 88.9 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7640G
Asus(1043 105B) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
2.67% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 4
2% 3.6 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 5.1
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.67%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 151 172 181 206 204 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.2% Average
Read 187
Write 194
Mixed 155
SusWrite 178
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 26.6
4K Mixed 17.8
58% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 125
94% 127 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 113%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB
850GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 97 96 98 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 73.7
Write 52.3
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 96.4
90% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 46013 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 5.1
15% 5.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 4.8
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K55N Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K55N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback