HP Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80CC
Memory1.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190517
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateDec 04 '22 at 22:05
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 30.4
2-Core 61
21% 45.7 Pts
4-Core 43.6
8-Core 46.2
6% 44.9 Pts
64-Core 43.1
3% 43.1 Pts
Poor: 16% Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
HP(103C 80CC) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
1.98% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 3.5
2% 3.27 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.98%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
813GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 70 65 70 64 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 49.2
Write 83.5
Mixed 54
SusWrite 67
47% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.4
90% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5674EB0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.17 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 0.6
4% 1.23 GB/s
Latency 651
6% 651 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,862 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback