Lenovo 90B6004UMT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 90B6004UMT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 367D
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '22 at 20:05
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 83.5
2-Core 140
59% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 314
39% 297 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
MSI(1462 2928) 2GB
CLim: 967 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
4.29% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 8.1
5% 6.33 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.29%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 500GB-$60
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 325 155 6.4 271 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
40% Average
Read 422
Write 260
Mixed 350
SusWrite 141
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 1
39% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 18.1
DQ Mixed 1.3
24% 62.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
930GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 167 166 168 169 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 158
Mixed 95
SusWrite 169
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 17.5
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90B6004UMT Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90B6004UMT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $347
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback