Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 343%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 412%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 124%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics288% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive331% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221011
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 04 '22 at 16:42
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700K-$330
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Memory 81.2
1-Core 227
2-Core 445
129% 251 Pts
4-Core 890
8-Core 1756
156% 1,323 Pts
64-Core 2,995
185% 2,995 Pts
Poor: 120%
This bench: 124%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
288% Outstanding
Lighting 427
Reflection 423
Parallax 479
348% 443 fps
MRender 548
Gravity 371
Splatting 264
308% 394 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 288%
Great: 305%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
739GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR048 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1848 1884 1897 1929 1945 1945 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
331% Outstanding
Read 1,149
Write 1,908
Mixed 1,410
SusWrite 1,908
362% 1,594 MB/s
4K Read 57.5
4K Write 281
4K Mixed 92
354% 143 MB/s
DQ Read 1,053
DQ Write 1,679
DQ Mixed 1,583
1,138% 1,438 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 331%
Great: 299%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF548C38-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
162% Outstanding
MC Read 66
MC Write 63.3
MC Mixed 58.7
179% 62.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 52
SC Mixed 31
100% 35.1 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 127%
This bench: 162%
Great: 167%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 500 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $491
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback