Lenovo 90LW00AUUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 90LW00AUUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3714
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200629
Uptime7.3 Days
Run DateDec 04 '22 at 13:48
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 676
72% 575 Pts
64-Core 683
42% 683 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
MSI(1462 375E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.4% Very good
Lighting 94.7
Reflection 92.7
Parallax 85.7
77% 91 fps
MRender 97.4
Gravity 86.1
Splatting 74
69% 85.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4M2QEXH7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,875
Write 1,512
Mixed 1,181
338% 1,522 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 60.7
198% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 993
DQ Write 827
DQ Mixed 916
684% 912 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 279%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
444GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 414 437 449 407 404 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 453
Write 375
Mixed 330
SusWrite 417
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 30.6
104% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 276
218% 302 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.3% Excellent
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 24.3
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.9
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90LW00AUUS Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

System: Lenovo 90LW00AUUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback