HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics83.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemHP EliteBook x360 1040 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 876D
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221013
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 04 '22 at 09:41
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 69.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 213
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 403
45% 354 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
HP(103C 8557) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1694
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.1% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 87.4
Parallax 97.2
88% 97.4 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 87
Splatting 80.1
74% 92.5 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-000H1 512GB
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS4NFXV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1100 1159 1174 921 305 308 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,206
Write 1,147
Mixed 1093
SusWrite 828
240% 1,068 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 62.1
209% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 721
DQ Write 422
DQ Mixed 557
418% 566 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 189%
Great: 225%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT53E1G32D4NQ-046W:E 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4000 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.7% Excellent
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 27.9
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 34.7
SC Mixed 20.7
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook x360 1040 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook x360 1040 G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback