Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics91% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
18 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PM
Memory30.8 GB free of 40 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210827
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 04 '22 at 06:07
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 59
1-Core 125
2-Core 233
74% 139 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 569
60% 483 Pts
64-Core 551
34% 551 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 16E2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3595 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 122
Parallax 113
96% 118 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 94.7
Splatting 86.2
81% 101 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 91%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,579
Write 1,062
Mixed 1,139
279% 1,260 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 47.6
163% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 636
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 503
357% 466 MB/s
Poor: 137% Great: 313%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
480GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 881 1072 1126 1320 1117 1137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,556
Write 1,221
Mixed 1,106
SusWrite 1109
280% 1,248 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 48.7
160% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 713
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 500
365% 489 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 201%
Great: 421%
Sage 3639S 500GB
159GB free
Firmware: 0056
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 91 93 91 91 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.83% Terrible
Read 63.5
Write 81.9
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 91.5
15% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
2% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 8.83%
Great: 68%
ST320LT0 20-9YG142 320GB
257GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 52.4
Write 34.6
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 21.3
41% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
34% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 17%
Generic External 320GB
19GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 22 21 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 499
Write 2.7
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 21.2
106% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
50% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Corsair CMSX32GX4M1A2666C18 39GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 32767 MB
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 12.1
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM Builds (Compare 5,676 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback