Gigabyte GA-F2A85X-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A85X-D3H  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateDec 03 '22 at 20:15
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 78.4
1-Core 55.8
2-Core 105
51% 79.7 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 159
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
AMD(1002 9901) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
2.76% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 6.9
2% 4.7 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 5.3
4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.76%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 73 49 42 37 38 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 360
Write 243
Mixed 204
SusWrite 88.8
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 8.1
34% 9.97 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 149
117% 164 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
9GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 100 100 103 110 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 91.8
Write 92.3
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 104
64% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-038.A 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.8
13% 4.47 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A85X-D3H Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A85X-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $146
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback